Engineering design management plan

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

2 min read

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

article 3 days ago

An aircraft is centered in the image facing the left. It is on a runway of dark gray concrete and the surroundings are primarily dry grass, with another runway at the top of the image.

5 min read

NASA Earth Scientists Take Flight, Set Sail to Verify PACE Satellite Data

article 4 days ago

What’s Up: September 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

6 min read

What’s Up: September 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

article 5 days ago

Missions

Humans in Space

Earth & Climate

The Solar System

The Universe

Science

Aeronautics

Technology

Learning Resources

About NASA

NASA en Español

News & Events

Multimedia

Featured

NASA'S Europa Clipper Spacecraft

5 min read

NASA Invites Social Creators to Experience Launch of Europa Clipper Mission

article 5 days ago

Persevering Through the Storm

2 min read

Persevering Through the Storm

article 3 days ago

NASA’s Hubble, MAVEN Help Solve the Mystery of Mars’ Escaping Water

6 min read

NASA’s Hubble, MAVEN Help Solve the Mystery of Mars’ Escaping Water

article 4 days ago

Highlights

3 min read

NASA Astronaut Don Pettit’s Science of Opportunity on Space Station

article 4 days ago

Technicians are building tooling in High Bay 2 at NASA Kennedy that will allow NASA and Boeing, the SLS core stage lead contractor, to vertically integrate the core stage.

3 min read

NASA, Boeing Optimizing Vehicle Assembly Building High Bay for Future SLS Stage Production

article 2 weeks ago

4 min read

NASA Seeks Input for Astrobee Free-flying Space Robots

article 2 weeks ago

Highlights

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

2 min read

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

article 3 days ago

An aircraft is centered in the image facing the left. It is on a runway of dark gray concrete and the surroundings are primarily dry grass, with another runway at the top of the image.

5 min read

NASA Earth Scientists Take Flight, Set Sail to Verify PACE Satellite Data

article 4 days ago

Still image from PREFIRE animation

5 min read

NASA Mission Gets Its First Snapshot of Polar Heat Emissions

article 5 days ago

Highlights

NASA’s Hubble, MAVEN Help Solve the Mystery of Mars’ Escaping Water

6 min read

NASA’s Hubble, MAVEN Help Solve the Mystery of Mars’ Escaping Water

article 4 days ago

The image shows a compact, handheld water dispenser device placed on a table, with several vacuum-sealed packets of food arranged <a href=in front of it. The device is white with yellow tape and has various labels and instructions on its surface. It includes a large, graduated syringe-like component marked in milliliters, used for precise water measurement. The food packets in front of the device contain different types of rehydratable meals in various colors and textures, indicating the preparation of food for consumption in a space environment. The background features a white grid pattern, enhancing the focus on the device and food packets." width="1024" height="811" />

2 min read

Artemis IV: Gateway Gadget Fuels Deep Space Dining

article 4 days ago

What’s Up: September 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

6 min read

What’s Up: September 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

article 5 days ago

Featured

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

2 min read

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

article 3 days ago

NASA’s Webb Reveals Distorted Galaxy Forming Cosmic Question Mark

5 min read

NASA’s Webb Reveals Distorted Galaxy Forming Cosmic Question Mark

article 5 days ago

NASA’s Mini BurstCube Mission Detects Mega Blast

3 min read

NASA’s Mini BurstCube Mission Detects Mega Blast

article 5 days ago

Highlights

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

2 min read

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

article 3 days ago

TRACERS

2 min read

TRACERS

article 3 days ago

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

2 min read

Hubble Examines a Busy Galactic Center

article 3 days ago

Highlights

An up-close view of ice that covers propeller blades inside the Icing Research Tunnel.

5 min read

NASA Tunnel Generates Decades of Icy Aircraft Safety Data

article 4 days ago

A four-engine turboprop aircraft in a red and white livery takes off from a runway on its way to be modified into a hybrid electric aircraft. Other airplanes can be seen in the distance.

4 min read

Research Plane Dons New Colors for NASA Hybrid Electric Flight Tests

article 5 days ago

A white Gulfstream IV airplane flies to the left of the frame over a tan desert landscape below and blue mountain ranges in the back of the image. The plane’s tail features the NASA logo, and its wings have winglets. Visible in the lower right third of the image, directly behind the airplane’s wingtip is the Mojave Air and Space Port in Mojave, California.

2 min read

NASA G-IV Plane Will Carry Next-Generation Science Instrument

article 1 week ago

Highlights

bright blue cloud fills the scene, orange-red rings surround bright-white stars in the upper-left corner of the image

1 min read

OSAM-1 Partnership Opportunity: Request for Information

article 3 days ago

Two robotic arms wrapped in gold material sitting on top of a black and silver box.

2 min read

NASA to Support DARPA Robotic Satellite Servicing Program

article 4 days ago

A prototype of a robot built to access underwater areas where Antarctic ice shelves meet land is lowered through the ice during a field test north of Alaska in March.

5 min read

NASA JPL Developing Underwater Robots to Venture Deep Below Polar Ice

article 2 weeks ago

Featured

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

2 min read

NASA Summer Camp Inspires Future Climate Leaders

article 3 days ago

Learn Math with NASA Science

2 min read

Learn Math with NASA Science

article 3 days ago

In this photo taken from the International Space Station, the Moon passes <a href=in front of the Sun casting its shadow, or umbra, and darkening a portion of the Earth's surface above Texas during the annular solar eclipse Oct. 14, 2023." width="1024" height="683" />

4 min read

Eclipses Create Atmospheric Gravity Waves, NASA Student Teams Confirm

article 4 days ago

Featured

Two robotic arms wrapped in gold material sitting on top of a black and silver box.

2 min read

NASA to Support DARPA Robotic Satellite Servicing Program

article 4 days ago

NASA'S Europa Clipper Spacecraft

5 min read

NASA Invites Social Creators to Experience Launch of Europa Clipper Mission

article 5 days ago

An up-close view of ice that covers propeller blades inside the Icing Research Tunnel.

5 min read

NASA Tunnel Generates Decades of Icy Aircraft Safety Data

article 4 days ago

Highlights

A close up image of a set of massive solar arrays measuring about 46.5 feet (14.2 meters) long and about 13.5 feet (4.1 meters) high on NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft inside the agency’s Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

5 min read

La NASA invita a los medios al lanzamiento de Europa Clipper

article 5 days ago

A man supporting the installation of the X-59 ejection seat.

3 min read

El X-59 de la NASA avanza en las pruebas de preparación para volar

article 5 days ago

Technicians tested deploying a set of massive solar arrays

7 min read

La NASA invita a creadores de las redes sociales al lanzamiento de la misión Europa Clipper

article 5 days ago

Contents

J.1 SEMP Content

The Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) is the foundation document for the technical and engineering activities conducted during the project. The SEMP conveys information to all of the personnel on the technical integration methodologies and activities for the project within the scope of the project plan. SEMP content can exist as a stand-alone document or, for smaller projects, in higher-level project documentation.

The SEMP provides the specifics of the technical effort and describes what technical processes will be used, how the processes will be applied using appropriate activities, how the project will be organized to accomplish the activities, and the resources required for accomplishing the activities. The SEMP provides the framework for realizing the appropriate work products that meet the entry and success criteria of the applicable project life cycle phases to provide management with necessary information for assessing technical progress.

Because the SEMP provides the specific technical and management information to understand the technical integration and interfaces, its documentation and approval serve as an agreement within the project of how the technical work will be conducted. The SEMP communicates to the team itself, managers, customers, and other stakeholders the technical effort that will be performed by the assigned technical team.

The technical team, working under the overall program/project plan, develops and updates the SEMP as necessary. The technical team works with the project manager to review the content and obtain concurrence. The SEMP includes the following three general sections:

  1. Technical program planning and control, which describe the processes for planning and control of the engineering efforts for the design, development, test, and evaluation of the system.
  2. Systems engineering processes, which include specific tailoring of the systems engineering process as described in the NPR, implementation procedures, trade study methodologies, tools, and models to be used.
  3. Engineering specialty integration describes the integration of the technical disciplines’ efforts into the systems engineering process and summarizes each technical discipline effort and cross references each of the specific and relevant plans.

The SEMP outline in this appendix is guidance to be used in preparing a stand-alone project SEMP. The level of detail in the project SEMP should be adapted based on the size of the project. For a small project, the material in the SEMP can be placed in the project plan’s technical summary, and this annotated outline should be used as a topic guide.

Some additional important points on the SEMP:

J.2 Terms Used

Terms used in the SEMP should have the same meaning as the terms used in the NPR 7123.1, Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements.

J.3 Annotated Outline

Title Page

This landscape of “mountains” and “valleys” speckled with glittering stars is actually the edge of a nearby, young, star-forming region called NGC 3324 in the Carina Nebula. Captured in infrared light by NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope, this image reveals for the first time previously invisible areas of star birth.

NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI

1.0 Purpose and Scope

This section provides a brief description of the purpose, scope, and content of the SEMP.

2.0 Applicable Documents

This section of the SEMP lists the documents applicable to this specific project and its SEMP implementation. This section should list major standards and procedures that this technical effort for this specific project needs to follow. Examples of specific procedures to list could include procedures for hazardous material handling, crew training plans for control room operations, special instrumentation techniques, special interface documentation for vehicles, and maintenance procedures specific to the project.

3.0 Technical Summary

This section contains an executive summary describing the problem to be solved by this technical effort and the purpose, context, and products to be developed and integrated with other interfacing systems identified.

Key Questions

  1. What is the problem we’re trying to solve?
  2. What are the influencing factors?
  3. What are the critical questions?
  4. What are the overall project constraints in terms of cost, schedule, and technical performance
  5. How will we know when we have adequately defined the problem?
  6. Who are the customers?
  7. Who are the users?
  8. What are the customer and user priorities?
  9. What is the relationship to other projects?

3.1 System Description

This section contains a definition of the purpose of the system being developed and a brief description of the purpose of the products of the product layer of the system structure to which this SEMP applies. Each product layer includes the system end products and their subsystems and the supporting or enabling products and any other work products (plans, baselines) required for the development of the system. The description should include any interfacing systems and system products, including humans with which the system products will interact physically, cognitively, functionally, or electronically.

3.2 System Structure

This section contains an explanation of how the technical portion of the product layer (including enabling products, technical cost, and technical schedule) will be developed, how the resulting product layers will be integrated into the project portion of the WBS, and how the overall system structure will be developed. This section contains a description of the relationship of the specification tree and the drawing tree with the products of the system structure and how the relationship and interfaces of the system end products and their life cycle-enabling products will be managed throughout the planned technical effort.

3.3 Product Integration

This section contains an explanation of how the products will be integrated and describes clear organizational responsibilities and interdependencies and whether the organizations are geographically dispersed or managed across Centers. This section should also address how products created under a diverse set of contracts are to be integrated, including roles and responsibilities. This includes identifying organizations—intra-and inter-NASA, other Government agencies, contractors, or other partners—and delineating their roles and responsibilities. Product integration includes the integration of analytical products.

When components or elements will be available for integration needs to be clearly understood and identified on the schedule to establish critical schedule issues.

3.4 Planning Context

This section contains the programmatic constraints (e.g., NPR 7120.5) that affect the planning and implementation of the common technical processes to be applied in performing the technical effort. The constraints provide a linkage of the technical effort with the applicable product life cycle phases covered by the SEMP including, as applicable, milestone decision gates, major technical reviews, key intermediate events leading to project completion, life cycle phase, event entry and success criteria, and major baseline and other work products to be delivered to the sponsor or customer of the technical effort.

3.5 Boundary of Technical Effort

This section contains a description of the boundary of the general problem to be solved by the technical effort, including technical and project constraints that affect the planning. Specifically, it identifies what can be controlled by the technical team (inside the boundary) and what influences the technical effort and is influenced by the technical effort but not controlled by the technical team (outside the boundary). Specific attention should be given to physical, cognitive, functional, and electronic interfaces across the boundary.

A description of the boundary of the system can include the following:

3.6 Cross References

This section contains cross references to appropriate nontechnical plans and critical reference material that interface with the technical effort. It contains a summary description of how the technical activities covered in other plans are accomplished as fully integrated parts of the technical effort.

4.0 Technical Effort Integration

This section describes how the various inputs to the technical effort will be integrated into a coordinated effort that meets cost, schedule, and performance objectives.

The section should describe the integration and coordination of the specialty engineering disciplines into the systems engineering process during each iteration of the processes. Where there is potential for overlap of specialty efforts, the SEMP should define the relative responsibilities and authorities of each specialty. This section should contain, as needed, the project’s approach to the following:

The approach for coordination of diverse technical disciplines and integration of the development tasks should be described. For example, this can include the use of multidiscipline integrated teaming approaches—e.g., an HSI team—or specialized control boards. The scope and timing of the specialty engineering tasks should be described along with how specialty engineering disciplines are represented on all technical teams and during all life cycle phases of the project.

4.1 Responsibility and Authority

This section describes the organizing structure for the technical teams assigned to this technical effort and includes how the teams will be staffed and managed.

Key Questions

  1. What organization/panel will serve as the designated governing authority for this project?
  2. How will multidisciplinary teamwork be achieved?
  3. What are the roles, responsibilities, and authorities required to perform the activities of each planned common technical process?
  4. What should be the planned technical staffing by discipline and expertise level?
  5. What is required for technical staff training?
  6. How will the assignment of roles, responsibilities, and authorities to appropriate project stakeholders or technical teams be accomplished?
  7. How are we going to structure the project to enable this problem to be solved on schedule and within cost?
  8. What does systems engineering management bring to the table?

The section should provide an organization chart and denote who on the team is responsible for each activity. It should indicate the lines of authority and responsibility. It should define the resolution authority to make decisions/decision process. It should show how the engineers/engineering disciplines relate.

The systems engineering roles and responsibilities need to be addressed for the following: project office, user, Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), systems engineering, design engineering, specialty engineering, and contractor.

4.2 Contractor Integration

This section describes how the technical effort of in-house and external contractors is to be integrated with the NASA technical team efforts. The established technical agreements should be described along with how contractor progress will be monitored against the agreement, how technical work or product requirement change requests will be handled, and how deliverables will be accepted. The section specifically addresses how interfaces between the NASA technical team and the contractor will be implemented for each of the 17 common technical processes. For example, it addresses how the NASA technical team will be involved with reviewing or controlling contractor-generated design solution definition documentation or how the technical team will be involved with product verification and product validation activities.

Key deliverables for the contractor to complete their systems and those required of the contractor for other project participants need to be identified and established on the schedule.

4.3 Analytical Tools that Support Integration

This section describes the methods (such as integrated computer-aided tool sets, integrated work product databases, and technical management information systems) that will be used to support technical effort integration.

5.0 Common Technical Processes Implementation

Each of the 17 common technical processes will have a separate subsection that contains a plan for performing the required process activities as appropriately tailored. (See NPR 7123.1 for the process activities required and tailoring.) Implementation of the 17 common technical processes includes (1) the generation of the outcomes needed to satisfy the entry and success criteria of the applicable product life cycle phase or phases identified in D.4.4.4, and (2) the necessary inputs for other technical processes. These sections contain a description of the approach, methods, and tools for:

This section should also include the project-specific description of each of the 17 processes to be used, including the specific tailoring of the requirements to the system and the project; the procedures to be used in implementing the processes; in-house documentation; trade study methodology; types of mathematical and/or simulation models to be used; and generation of specifications.

Key Questions

  1. What are the systems engineering processes for this project?
  2. What are the methods that we will apply for each systems engineering task?
  3. What are the tools we will use to support these methods? How will the tools be integrated?
  4. How will we control configuration development?
  5. How and when will we conduct technical reviews?
  6. How will we establish the need for and manage trade-off studies?
  7. Who has authorization for technical change control?
  8. How will we manage requirements? interfaces? documentation?

6.0 Technology Insertion

This section describes the approach and methods for identifying key technologies and their associated risks and criteria for assessing and inserting technologies, including those for inserting critical technologies from technology development projects. An approach should be developed for appropriate level and timing of technology insertion. This could include alternative approaches to take advantage of new technologies to meet systems needs as well as alternative options if the technologies do not prove appropriate in result or timing. The strategy for an initial technology assessment within the scope of the project requirements should be provided to identify technology constraints for the system.

Key Questions

7.0 Additional SE Functions and Activities

This section describes other areas not specifically included in previous sections but that are essential for proper planning and conduct of the overall technical effort.

7.1 System Safety

This section describes the approach and methods for conducting safety analysis and assessing the risk to operators, the system, the environment, or the public.

7.2 Engineering Methods and Tools

This section describes the methods and tools that are not included in the technology insertion sections but are needed to support the overall technical effort. It identifies those tools to be acquired and tool training requirements.

This section defines the development environment for the project, including automation, simulation, and software tools. If required, it describes the tools and facilities that need to be developed or acquired for all disciplines on the project. It describes important enabling strategies such as standardizing tools across the project, or utilizing a common input and output format to support a broad range of tools used on the project. It defines the requirements for information management systems and for using existing elements. It defines and plans for the training required to use the tools and technology across the project.

7.3 Specialty Engineering

This section describes engineering discipline and specialty requirements that apply across projects and the WBS models of the system structure. Examples of these requirement areas would include planning for safety, reliability, human factors, logistics, maintainability, quality, operability, and supportability. It includes estimates of staffing levels for these disciplines and incorporates them with the project requirements.

7.4 Technical Performance Measures

a. This section describes the TPMs that have been derived from the MOEs and MOPs for the project. The TPMs are used to define and track the technical progress of the systems engineering effort. (The unique identification numbers in red reference the corresponding requirement in NPR 7123.1.) The performance metrics need to address the minimally required TPMs as defined in NPR 7123.1. These include:

  1. Mass margins for projects involving hardware [SE-62].
  2. Power margins for projects that are powered [SE-63].
  3. Review Trends including closure of review action documentation (Request for Action, Review Item Discrepancies, and/or Action Items as established by the project) for all software and hardware projects [SE-64].

b. Other performance measure that should be considered by the project include:

Key Questions

  1. What metrics will be used to measure technical progress?
  2. What metrics will be used to identify process improvement opportunities?
  3. How will we measure progress against the plans and schedules?
  4. How often will progress be reported? By whom? To whom?

7.5 Heritage

This section describes the heritage or legacy products that will be used in the project. It should include a discussion of which products are planned to be used, the rationale for their use, and the analysis or testing needed to assure they will perform as intended in the stated use.

7.6 Other

This section is reserved to describe any unique SE functions or activities for the project that are not covered in other sections.

8.0 Integration with the Project Plan and Technical Resource Allocation

This section describes how the technical effort will integrate with project management and defines roles and responsibilities. It addresses how technical requirements will be integrated with the project plan to determine the allocation of resources, including cost, schedule, and personnel, and how changes to the allocations will be coordinated.

Key Questions

  1. How will we assess risk? What thresholds are needed for triggering mitigation activities? How will we integrate risk management into the technical decision process?
  2. How will we communicate across and outside of the project?
  3. How will we record decisions?
  4. How do we incorporate lessons learned from other projects?

This section describes the interface between all of the technical aspects of the project and the overall project management process during the systems engineering planning activities and updates. All activities to coordinate technical efforts with the overall project are included, such as technical interactions with the external stakeholders, users, and contractors.

9.0 Compliance Matrices

Appendix H.2 in NPR 7123.1A is the basis for the compliance matrix for this section of the SEMP. The project will complete this matrix from the point of view of the project and the technical scope. Each requirement will be addressed as compliant, partially compliant, or noncompliant. Compliant requirements should indicate which process or activity addresses the compliance. For example, compliance can be accomplished by using a Center process or by using a project process as described in another section of the SEMP or by reference to another documented process. Noncompliant areas should state the rationale for noncompliance.

Appendices

Appendices are included, as necessary, to provide a glossary, acronyms and abbreviations, and information published separately for convenience in document maintenance. Included are: (1) information that may be pertinent to multiple topic areas (e.g., description of methods or procedures); (2) charts and proprietary data applicable to the technical efforts required in the SEMP; and (3) a summary of technical plans associated with the project. Each appendix should be referenced in one of the sections of the engineering plan where data would normally have been provided.

Templates

Any templates for forms, plans, or reports the technical team will need to fill out, like the format for the verification and validation plan, should be included in the appendices.

References

This section contains all documents referenced in the text of the SEMP.

This landscape of “mountains” and “valleys” speckled with glittering stars is actually the edge of a nearby, young, star-forming region called NGC 3324 in the Carina Nebula. Captured in infrared light by NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope, this image reveals for the first time previously invisible areas of star birth.

NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI

This landscape of “mountains” and “valleys” speckled with glittering stars is actually the edge of a nearby, young, star-forming region called NGC 3324 in the Carina Nebula. Captured in infrared light by NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope, this image reveals for the first time previously invisible areas of star birth.